<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Preventing Terror By Stripping Our Clothes and Privacy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stanfordreview.org/2009/12/27/preventing-terror-by-stripping-our-clothes-and-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stanfordreview.org/2009/12/27/preventing-terror-by-stripping-our-clothes-and-privacy/</link>
	<description>A liberal education, politics, and the intersection thereof at Stanford University.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 19:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://blog.stanfordreview.org/2009/12/27/preventing-terror-by-stripping-our-clothes-and-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-2238</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stanfordreview.org/?p=1612#comment-2238</guid>
		<description>Gordon Brown is a traitor to his country. 
The terrorists have scarred the not properly elected Prime Minister (what a joke) in to forcing civilised human beings in to getting there naked bodies photo graphed and looked at in detail by anyone who is TRAINED.  Have these perverts been vetted or are they on the sex offenders list. I bet all the Trained individuals are men.
A Doctor is the only other man i would willingly let look at my wife’s naked body for medical reasons not some floor cleaner who applied for a job as pervert. Looking for bombs or staring at naked woman all day. What a job to have. Not having to pay for porn but also getting paid to look at it. I spoke to a friend at an air port and he told me that the images are kept for an hour before they are deleted. Just encase something happens on the plane they can then go back and have another look at the porn. So all this “the images aren’t stored in anyway and are deleted straight away” is complete rubbish!
In order for myself and family to have a nice holiday in the sun I am expected to let my wife expose herself to a complete stranger.
I didn’t marry a slag. Porn stars have a choice to get photo graphed, our wife’s and children don’t. Until these Skandalis machines are destroyed I am stuck in this country for a holiday. To drive to a hot country with a young family is unfair on them.
The dignity of our loved ones has been thrown away just because of some mud hut dwellers go boo !!!
Do you think Winston Churchill would have aloud his loved ones to expose there genitals to strangers just so they could go on holiday.  
Get some Genitals Brown. Don’t jump on the first band wagon that they say it will stop terrorists. This last attack would still of happened even if he had gone through a scanner. 
I served in the Army for my family and friends protection. Now my Supposed Leader is making them strip in front of anyone deemed TRAINED. 
Disgusting behaviour from a supposed leader of men.
Bend over Britain all is lost.

PS funny how the shares in these machines are on the up. Some one is making a lot of money out this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gordon Brown is a traitor to his country.<br />
The terrorists have scarred the not properly elected Prime Minister (what a joke) in to forcing civilised human beings in to getting there naked bodies photo graphed and looked at in detail by anyone who is TRAINED.  Have these perverts been vetted or are they on the sex offenders list. I bet all the Trained individuals are men.<br />
A Doctor is the only other man i would willingly let look at my wife’s naked body for medical reasons not some floor cleaner who applied for a job as pervert. Looking for bombs or staring at naked woman all day. What a job to have. Not having to pay for porn but also getting paid to look at it. I spoke to a friend at an air port and he told me that the images are kept for an hour before they are deleted. Just encase something happens on the plane they can then go back and have another look at the porn. So all this “the images aren’t stored in anyway and are deleted straight away” is complete rubbish!<br />
In order for myself and family to have a nice holiday in the sun I am expected to let my wife expose herself to a complete stranger.<br />
I didn’t marry a slag. Porn stars have a choice to get photo graphed, our wife’s and children don’t. Until these Skandalis machines are destroyed I am stuck in this country for a holiday. To drive to a hot country with a young family is unfair on them.<br />
The dignity of our loved ones has been thrown away just because of some mud hut dwellers go boo !!!<br />
Do you think Winston Churchill would have aloud his loved ones to expose there genitals to strangers just so they could go on holiday.<br />
Get some Genitals Brown. Don’t jump on the first band wagon that they say it will stop terrorists. This last attack would still of happened even if he had gone through a scanner.<br />
I served in the Army for my family and friends protection. Now my Supposed Leader is making them strip in front of anyone deemed TRAINED.<br />
Disgusting behaviour from a supposed leader of men.<br />
Bend over Britain all is lost.</p>
<p>PS funny how the shares in these machines are on the up. Some one is making a lot of money out this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blog.stanfordreview.org/2009/12/27/preventing-terror-by-stripping-our-clothes-and-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1646</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stanfordreview.org/?p=1612#comment-1646</guid>
		<description>We should really be focused on dismantling the elements of our foreign policy that breeds these terrorists. Our military presence in Saudi Arabia fueled bin Laden&#039;s hatred. I&#039;m sure that our assistance in foreign military operations, such as the recent Yemeni air strikes or the conflict in Gaza, will incite even more hatred towards the U.S. 

Rather than be honest about the effect of these policies, our government will choose to maintain them and pretend that technology like the full-body scanners will &quot;protect&quot; us from those who wish to do us harm.

I wonder who benefits from the push for full-body scanners? Who makes these things?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should really be focused on dismantling the elements of our foreign policy that breeds these terrorists. Our military presence in Saudi Arabia fueled bin Laden&#8217;s hatred. I&#8217;m sure that our assistance in foreign military operations, such as the recent Yemeni air strikes or the conflict in Gaza, will incite even more hatred towards the U.S. </p>
<p>Rather than be honest about the effect of these policies, our government will choose to maintain them and pretend that technology like the full-body scanners will &#8220;protect&#8221; us from those who wish to do us harm.</p>
<p>I wonder who benefits from the push for full-body scanners? Who makes these things?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astyanax</title>
		<link>http://blog.stanfordreview.org/2009/12/27/preventing-terror-by-stripping-our-clothes-and-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1645</link>
		<dc:creator>astyanax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 15:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stanfordreview.org/?p=1612#comment-1645</guid>
		<description>&quot;Anyone within TSA who thinks the right lesson from this is to further inconvenience ordinary Americans, rather than bring more security to bear on known suspects, is either too stupid to be worth listening to, or actively traitorous.&quot;

Obviously
Your administration is afraid to point out that only a few people are to be scoped .They are afraid because of &quot;discrimination positive&quot; in french or affirmative action ; islamophobia is a far worse ennemy for them than these one who destroyed your Twin towers .

War in Afghanistan is useless with such a way of thinking .
Was Richard Lyonheart ( Melek Ric for Saladdin )  afraid of his ennemies ??

Major Hassan at Fort Hood and now this one , who was known to be islamist ...

These UHF scanner are an unbearable offense for honnest passengers . Enough is enough . Catch the bad guys and send them to their paradise , Yemen or Iran .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyone within TSA who thinks the right lesson from this is to further inconvenience ordinary Americans, rather than bring more security to bear on known suspects, is either too stupid to be worth listening to, or actively traitorous.&#8221;</p>
<p>Obviously<br />
Your administration is afraid to point out that only a few people are to be scoped .They are afraid because of &#8220;discrimination positive&#8221; in french or affirmative action ; islamophobia is a far worse ennemy for them than these one who destroyed your Twin towers .</p>
<p>War in Afghanistan is useless with such a way of thinking .<br />
Was Richard Lyonheart ( Melek Ric for Saladdin )  afraid of his ennemies ??</p>
<p>Major Hassan at Fort Hood and now this one , who was known to be islamist &#8230;</p>
<p>These UHF scanner are an unbearable offense for honnest passengers . Enough is enough . Catch the bad guys and send them to their paradise , Yemen or Iran .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autumn Carter</title>
		<link>http://blog.stanfordreview.org/2009/12/27/preventing-terror-by-stripping-our-clothes-and-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>Autumn Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stanfordreview.org/?p=1612#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>Yes, you would think that using that intelligence on the back end would prevent us from even having an issue here on the front end.  But rather connect dots, or even pay attention to the individual dots, we settle for blanket regulations and procedure.  Our methods should be targeted and concentrated rather than broad and water-down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you would think that using that intelligence on the back end would prevent us from even having an issue here on the front end.  But rather connect dots, or even pay attention to the individual dots, we settle for blanket regulations and procedure.  Our methods should be targeted and concentrated rather than broad and water-down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Chang</title>
		<link>http://blog.stanfordreview.org/2009/12/27/preventing-terror-by-stripping-our-clothes-and-privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Chang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 06:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stanfordreview.org/?p=1612#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Abdulmutallab was not just on our list of persons with likely terrorist connections; his own father gave us additional warning a few weeks ago, and he even had a one-way plane ticket.  Anyone within TSA who thinks the right lesson from this is to further inconvenience ordinary Americans, rather than bring more security to bear on known suspects, is either too stupid to be worth listening to, or actively traitorous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abdulmutallab was not just on our list of persons with likely terrorist connections; his own father gave us additional warning a few weeks ago, and he even had a one-way plane ticket.  Anyone within TSA who thinks the right lesson from this is to further inconvenience ordinary Americans, rather than bring more security to bear on known suspects, is either too stupid to be worth listening to, or actively traitorous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
